> punishing users of a client for the dev not bending over for you censorship-happy fucks
god you're pathetic
@lis Still don't understand why the fuck an application should block something.
It's just a tool, let the user do whatever they want
Its a devs choice to block or not block something. Just as much as its a users choice to use that software or something else.
The shame here is by accusing the devs who give choice to their users of promoting hate speech, they've become like their enemy. They've created hate speech pointed at devs who offer choice. They've shamed themselves by becoming like their enemy.
@lis i also feel like this is going too far
i really don't think software projects should be policing their users
of course i VERY LOUDLY disagree with hate speech, but this isn't the way to solve it
@firstname.lastname@example.org what would stop people from setting the user agent to "Fuck the Police" and just continue on? how far is this gonna go smh
@lis i thought admins and users are free to act how they want.
or is it about pedaling hate speech?
@lis Well, this pretty clearly says "This instance is strictly for people who think exactly like me". I guess there will be more stuff like this in the future and people will have to carefully choose their instances...
@lis appropriate response is to build spoofing approved clients into the next version of Fedilab.
Welcome to your niu world ! We are a cute and loving international community Ｏ(≧▽≦)Ｏ !