thinking about how loom.cc relies on "really big numbers" and obscurity to cloak resources.
wondering how realistic (in modern nation state terms) just rolling through every possible option and issuing move commands would be.
would want to toss them across proxies and possibly jumble some of the attempts in to batches to make it look a little harder to try.
suppose if you had a fail2ban which considered accessing "too many" dead id's as banworthy that might hurt it too.
thought i was cool thinking of using lucre tokens but tagging messages with them, so you could move some random digital assets in to a "cashiers check" that could be redeemed by someone else without leaving a direct person to person link.
then today i realize that the alphabet soup could just look at who happened to lose 12 ice cream tokens prior to someone else gainin 12 ice cream tokens and probably re-correlate it that way.
granted routing through a token destroys the *certainty* of an Alice-to-Bob exchange, spooks aren't all that worried about >95% accuracy ("we kill people based on meta-data".)
Transhumanist. Ice queen.
Welcome to your niu world ! We are a cute and loving international community Ｏ(≧▽≦)Ｏ !